A sophisticated bioinformatics AI system for root-cause analysis of failed laboratory experiments. Transforms raw experiment descriptions into actionable troubleshooting recommendations using LLM reasoning, knowledge retrieval, and pattern detection.
try now →FailedExp employs a multi-stage agent pipeline powered by LLM reasoning, knowledge retrieval, and pattern detection. The system orchestrates six sequential nodes, each transforming experiment data into structured insights.
Every hypothesis has evidence citations. Users see exactly why the system reached its conclusions, critical for laboratory decision-making.
Deterministic rule-based patterns ensure consistent results. Same input → same patterns (no ML variance).
New techniques added as rules + templates. Current: 11 experiment types. Future-proof architecture for 20+ types.
Async Python + PostgreSQL + ChromaDB supports 1000+ concurrent requests. Sub-20s latency on standard servers.
End-to-end analysis pipeline with detailed timing breakdown:
| Stage | Time | Bottleneck |
|---|---|---|
| Parse | 2-3s | LLM API latency |
| Retrieve | 1-2s | ChromaDB vector search |
| Detect | 0.5s | Rule matching (deterministic) |
| Hypothesize | 4-6s | LLM reasoning |
| Recommend | 2-3s | LLM personalization |
| Total | 10-15s | LLM inference (60%) |
Pydantic validator automatically parses temperature strings in any format: "95°C" → 95.0, "98 °C" → 98.0, "95" → 95.0. Handles user input variations gracefully.
Missing or failed controls are RED FLAGS. Absence of negative controls alone suggests contamination risk and is weighted heavily in the failure pattern taxonomy.
Instead of relying solely on Claude's training data, augments with curated peer-reviewed protocols and institutional troubleshooting guides via ChromaDB semantic search.
Ready to analyze your failed experiments?
open failedexp →